Should You Read This or Visit Internet Addicts Anonymous?

Many readers of this post are addicts. They are Internet addicts, according to Medill Reports from Northwest University. Today we have all grown some what dependent on the Internet. It is one of our primary communication sources via email, it tells us what movies are on at our local theaters and whether or not they are worth viewing, and it communicates information we want to convey about our business or gives the information about businesses we are interested in. but it is more, so much more.

According go the Medill Reports: "Kimberly Young, clinical director of the Center for Internet Addiction Recovery and author of the book 'Caught in the Net,' said that about 5 percent to 10 percent of Americans --15 to 30 million people -- may suffer from Internet addiction. And the problem may be even greater elsewhere. Young said 18 to 30 percent of the populations of China, Korea and Taiwan, where the Internet is even more popular than in the U.S., may be addicted."

Addiction, according to the study is defined as "online-related compulsive behavior that interferes with normal living and causes severe stress on family, friends, loved ones and work -- is a psychological and behavioral problem." Smart phones have made the feeding of this addiction even easier to maintain. We should be talking business over lunch, but we are reading email. We should be watching our child's soccer game and instead are looking at our up coming schedule. Instead of being "there," wherever that is suppose to be, people are roaming around the World Wide Web.

What do these addicts find themselves doing? According to the report, "the main types of Internet addiction are cybersex, online affairs, online gambling, online gaming, compulsive surfing and even eBay addiction, Young added." The situation has gotten so bad, people spend 30 to 90 days at recovery centers to seek help about the Web.

The Internet is tougher than some more commonly known addictions to break. First of all, the Internet itself is completely culturally acceptable. Virtually everyone does it. That leads to the next problem, complete abandonment is very difficult because most of us need it to function in the modern world of business. But how does one go from 10 or more hours a day to a mere one or two? I'm sure someone will develop a web site to help people with such. Oh, the irony of it all!

To find out if you are an Internet Addict, visit the Center for Internet Addiction Recovery.

Would you like to get a periodical email of the best of Kevin Price's political and economic content? Subscribe to the Houston Business Review at Info@HoustonBusinessShow.com.

Kevin Price is Host of the Houston Business Show (M-F at 11 AM on CNN 650) and Publisher of the Houston Business Review. Hear the show live and online at HoustonBusinessShow.com. Visit the archive of past shows here.

US and Allies Pays to Free Hostages

I read in Reuters this morning that:

"U.N. nuclear inspectors verified the shut down of North Korea's reactor, confirming the most significant move to curb the North's atomic ambitions in years, but more remains to be done, the head of the IAEA said on Monday.

North Korea said over the weekend it had shut its Soviet-era Yongbyon nuclear reactor, which provides the secretive state with material for arms-grade plutonium, around the time it received the first shipment of 6,200 tonnes of oil provided by Seoul as part of an aid-for-disarmament deal (emphasis added).

"The reactor has been shut down," International Atomic Energy Agency director Mohamed ElBaradei told reporters in Bangkok. "We have verified the shutdown of the reactor."
The next step will be to verify that North Korea has shut other key facilities at Yongbyon, located about 100 km north of Pyongyang -- which include a plant to make plutonium.
"It's a very important step that we are taking this week, but it's a long way to go," ElBaradei told reporters in Bangkok.

He has said it will take IAEA personnel, who arrived in North Korea on Saturday, about a month to install seals and monitoring equipment to make sure Pyongyang keeps the reactor closed.

South Korea sent a second batch of 7,500 tonnes of oil to energy-starved North Korea on Monday, a Unification Ministry official said (emphasis added).

A provision of 50,000 tonnes of oil from the South is part of a Feb. 13 deal reached among the two Koreas, the United States, Japan, Russia and China on first suspending the operation of the North's nuclear facilities and then disabling them (emphasis added).

The impoverished North will receive an additional 950,000 tonnes of oil, security assurances and be better able to conduct international trade if it completely scraps its nuclear arms programme -- considered one of Asia's biggest security threats.

"With complete denuclearisation, everything is going to be possible," said Christopher Hill, the chief U.S. envoy to the nuclear talks (emphasis added).

Hill, in Seoul prior to heading to Beijing, called on the North to disable Yongbyon and provide a complete inventory of its atomic arms programme.

"I certainly have to anticipate that there will be problems in the future because I never thought it would take until July to get this first step done," Hill told reporters.

The six-way talks are set to resume on Wednesday in Beijing to map out the next phase of ending the nuclear programme.

In 1994, North Korea froze the Yongbyon reactor in exchange for energy aid. In late 2002, the United States accused Pyongyang of violating that deal by having a secret programme to enrich uranium for weapons.

In December 2002, North Korea said it was restarting the Yongbyon reactor. It disabled IAEA surveillance devices and expelled their inspectors."

This article says it all. The US and North Korea's neighbors are paying North Korea in exchange for the "release" of hostages (individuals in reach of North Korea's missile program or anyone who is vulnerable to terrorist who would buy the necessary materials and deliver such by more primitive means, in other words, virtually everyone).

This approach is extremely short sighted in my opinion. In addition to negotiating with kidnappers and terrorists (which the US is opposed to as an official policy), this new policy is built on world safety being based on North Korea's good word. I think anyone can see the foolishness of such a proposition, considering the millions who have died under this evil regime. Yes, there will be international organizations monitoring the progress, but we have seen how effective such groups are by looking at Iraq under the old regime.

This foolish policy will, in my opinion, come back to haunt the US and our allies. It will embolden Korea in its clearly dangerous and hostile intentions. I only hope we come to our senses before it is too late.