Christopher Dodd Has to Go

I am not at all sympathetic of the plight of the automobile industry. The Big Three of Detroit have largely brought their terrible situation upon themselves through decades of bad decision making. In spite of this reality, I was offended when Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT) informed the CEOs of Ford, Chrysler, and GM that if they wanted money for their companies, they needed to go. This is the same Christopher Dodd who has been on the Senate Banking Committee for years and oversaw the financial debacle of Wall Street that led to an $800 billion bailout at taxpayers expense. This is the same Dodd who has fueled record government spending for years that has led to our debt of trillions of dollars.

As chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Dodd proposed a housing bailout on the Senate floor in June 2008 that would assist troubled mortgage lenders such as Countrywide Financial. Condé Nast Portfolio reported that in 2003 Dodd had refinanced the mortgages on his homes in Washington, D.C. and Connecticut through Countrywide and had received favorable terms due to being placed in what was later called the "Friends of Angelo" (Countrywide's CEO) program. Dodd received mortgages from Countrywide at allegedly below-market rates on his Washington, D.C. and Connecticut homes. Dodd has not disclosed the below-market mortgages in any of six financial disclosure statements he filed with the Senate or Office of Government Ethics since obtaining the mortgages in 2003. The Senator's home state Hartford Courant reported Dodd had taken "a major credibility hit" from the scandal.

If direct payment has influence, the problem is even more widespread. Countrywide has also contributed a $21,000 total to Dodd’s campaigns since 1997. Dodd has also received $70,000 in campaign contributions from Bank of America, which is buying Countrywide, in the last year-and-a-half before the Countrywide Financial loan scandal surfaced. Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are the only other Senators who have received more money from Bank of America than Dodd. However, no politician has received more contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac than Dodd's combined $133,900.

Marcus Cicero, when discussing the Roman Empire, said "the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled..." Dodd's throwing stones in a glass house and maintaining a straight face in the process, is arrogance at its height. Senator Dodd needs to go and should be a part of a serious "house cleaning" that should be seen in both the US House and Senate. It is true that, in the end, many familiar faces like Dodd would disappear. That would be a face lift the US could afford.

Kevin Price is a syndicated columnist whose articles frequently appear at ChicagoSunTimes.com, Reuters.com, USAToday.com, and other national media. Kevin Price is Host of the Price of Business (M-F at 11 AM on CNN 650) and Publisher of the Houston Business Review. Hear the show live and online at PriceofBusiness.com. Visit the archive of past shows here.

Conditions for an Auto Bailout

It appears that the US Government IS going to give the "big three" their long desired loan, but at a smaller level. Until this past weekend, Congress had been unimpressed. But as if an oracle of God himself, President-Elect Obama has declared that a bailout is necessary and the Congress now seems willing to comply, although with a lighter than expected package. The new package looks like it will be around $16 billion (versus the $25-$35 billion we have heard earlier).

With this bailout, there should be certain conditions that must be complied or there should be no such hand outs (which is my preference). Here are a few of the conditions that should be required:

• End the controversial UAW "Job Bank" program until the loans are completely paid off. This program has paid tens of thousands to be idle at 90 percent of salary. Although the UAW has agreed to make concessions about the program, their current situation could have the practice back in full force within days of the bailout becoming law.


• Bring auto worker wages back to the real world. According to the Heritage Foundation, when it comes to salary and benefits, the average wage of all private sector employees is $25.36 and for American based Japanese auto plants (Honda, Nissan, Toyota) is $42.95 to $47.60 on average. The big three pays $70.51 (Ford), $73.26(GM), and $75.86 (Chrysler) per hour, per employee. These six digit wages for blue collar work should be brought into the real world.


• End the "30 and out" practice. The Detroit auto companies allow employees to retire with very lucrative packages at the young age of 30. If you start working at a plant at 20, you can retire at fifty. You can see where that can be costly. 60 or 65 should have to be the standard retirement age with taxpayers involvement.


• Seven week vacations need to be history. Detroit auto workers receive almost two months off a year. This is another pounding cost on a very weak industry that needs to change.


• Finally, they should require the companies to relocate to a right to work state. This would empower these companies to lower wages and make the other reforms listed above.

I am sure you are saying that such reforms will not be happening knowing the temperament of the auto industry and the lack of courage in Congress. You are, of course, exactly correct, which is among the reasons why the companies shouldn't receive the bailout.

Kevin Price is a syndicated columnist whose articles frequently appear at ChicagoSunTimes.com, Reuters.com, USAToday.com, and other national media. Kevin Price is Host of the Price of Business (M-F at 11 AM on CNN 650) and Publisher of the Houston Business Review. Hear the show live and online at PriceofBusiness.com. Visit the archive of past shows here.

Toyota: The Rising Sun Continues

Japan is known as the "land of the rising sun" and its chief auto maker, Toyota, continues its towering rise. This morning I was watching the Today Show and it was announced that the car maker has surpassed GM as the largest automobile producer in the world this past quarter. This is something that everyone in business and politics has been expecting for years. That time has come.

A half a century ago, there were a "Big Three" -- GM, Ford, and Chrysler -- that dominated the marketplace and no one imagined Toyota (or any other foreign auto maker) eclipsing any of them. Admittedly it is only one quarter, GM is still number one over all, but the slide for US car builders is expected to continue.

Why the decline of US auto makers? The cause is multi-fold:

* US auto makers are not nearly as nimble as their Japanese competitors. They are typically behind the curve and limping behind Japan when it comes to change.

* Japan has taken a surprisingly safe approach to auto making that gives the consumer assurances of the quality of product. It sounds "boring", but Japan's predictability in style and substance (e.g., engineering) has made it the up and coming "king of the road."

* The devastating impact of Big Labor. Unions have hampered these companies with salary and benefit packages that make it impossible for US companies to successfully compete. This is likely the number one reason.

The above are just a few examples, but Japan will continue to torment US auto makers and I expect its prominence to becomes permanent. That is destined to happen if the US doesn't do the things necessary to be competitive.

Ford Employees Learning Economics 101

I know this is going to sound harsh, but the economic realities that Ford employees are discovering are the same lessons everyone must learn in order to thrive in our current economy. During an interview on ABC News Nightline an employee was asked about the cause of the company's decline. She replied it was because Americans selfishly bought foreign cars at the expense of their fellow Americans. The interviewer asked a question that was shockingly perceptive in our current political environment, (paraphrase) "could it be that Americans don't want to pay for the amazing salaries and benefits that you boasted about earlier? Wouldn't they rather pay for the lower cost of buying a car made by Toyota with lower wages and benefits?" (One thing all the Ford employees discussed was how good it was for them financially).

The look on her face was amazing. It was like she had a "V-8" moment, but the negative type, not the one you see in the commercials. She said "the benefits are amazing, but I hate to think that is why they did it." But that is exactly why we -- all of us -- "did it." The economy is a lot of things, but it isn't personal. The invisible hand that Adam Smith discussed in the 18th century is alive and well today. People actively make self interested decisions daily, even as we criticize the ability of other countries in competing against us. The invisible hand, a force we can't see but is all so powerful, creates supply and demand, and controls our economy unless harassed by government.

A great example of this is Wal-Mart. If everyone I talk to about this "job exporting," "people exploiting," "made in the USA destroying" company is telling the truth, this company should be on the brink of bankruptcy and not, arguably, the most economically powerful company in the world. But people, even as they drive to the "hated" store, will decry the injustice of goods made by cheap labor and walk out with not a single item made in the USA (with the possible exception of a tag that was made in a US territory). In essence, they cry all the way to the bank in savings.
Is this a bad thing? Certainly not, in my opinion. Our country has an unemployment of only 4.7 percent, that is virtually zero unemployment when you consider the large number estimated who are voluntarily unemployed (seasonally employed, criminals, etc., equals around 4 percent). Because we are free to get what we want, largely from where we want, we are able to get Ford Escorts for only $14,000 (since they make much of their cars in "cheap labor" countries rather than $60,000 a year (which is what they would likely cost if made bumper to bumper in the US). I'm able to eliminate poverty voluntarily and long term in countries like China and India through my purchases (like we did in Japan 40 years ago) without the United Nations taking my money through redistribution as that organization is attempting to do (leading to corruption and international welfare dependency). We are able to truly take advantage of the law of comparative advantage (things being made were they most make sense economically) and the whole world benefits from it.

I believe people should give up the notion of stopping the imports and embrace them. They are making us richer, not poorer (by the way, our longest period of trade surpluses was during the Great Depression; trade deficits mean we can afford more than other countries; not a bad thing). Instead of grumbling about our imports, we should appreciate the good things we are doing for the world economy and simple common sense with our purchases. We don't make these purchase because they are bad, but because they are good for everyone.

What about the nice Americans who lost their jobs at Ford, GM and other companies? The reality is, most of them will quickly find themselves back on their feet, with either new jobs or created businesses as they pursue becoming their own boss. This loss, though sad, will be temporary, but the American resolve the prosper is permanent.