The Squeeze on Entrepreneurs

Over 80 percent of all businesses in this country are created by small business and over 90 percent of all jobs are created by such entrepreneurs, according to the Small Business Administration. It seems that this important engine of economic growth is under a constant state of siege by the government that continually taxes these companies without limits in order to subsidize those in poverty on the one end extreme and to bailout some of America's wealthiest businesses on the other. I cannot recall a time in this nation's recent history where small businesses have been under such pressure and yet have also been more important to the economy's future.

How important are small businesses? According to the SBA, entrepreneurs:

• Represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms.


• Employ about half of all private sector employees.
  
• Pay nearly 45 percent of total U.S. private payroll.
  
• Have generated 60 to 80 percent of net new jobs annually
  over the last decade.


• Create more than half of non farm private gross domestic
  product (GDP).


• Hire 40 percent of high tech workers (such as scientists,
  engineers, and computer workers).


• Are 52 percent home-based and 2 percent franchises.


• Made up 97.3 percent of all identified exporters and produced 28.9 percent of the known export value in FY 2006.


• Produce 13 times more patents per employee than large
  patenting firms; these patents are twice as likely as large
  firm patents to be among the one percent most cited.

The logic behind bailing out failed auto companies and financial institutions is because these type of companies individually employ large numbers of people. If a Ford or a GM go under, tens of thousands (or even hundreds of thousands) will be instantly unemployed and the ripple effect will be more like a tidal wave. However, if the local movie rental place, the convenience store, and sandwich restaurant go under, that only translates into a dozen or so positions. However, thousands of these small businesses going down, on the other hand, paints a much different picture.

The lessons we are learning from government is that obsolescence and a lack of competitiveness are only a problem if your business is small. The larger a company is, the more resistant it can afford to be to necessary change, the less important it is too make tough decisions, and the more likely that company will receive a free pass for poor performance. What type of companies are we going to have if they are not allowed to fail? Companies that are destined to fail at a huge cost to taxpayers who keep them up for years. The biggest victims will be the huge entrepreneurial class who more than carries its own in job creation, but also has among the biggest tax burden.

The government control, subsidy, and even ownership of large businesses has historically been known as fascism. We don't like the term because we think of our enemies during World War II. Unfortunately, if the shoe fits, we are destined to wear it. What is most striking is that this desire to accommodate the most massive of businesses at the expense of small ones seems to transcends party lines. Both McCain and Obama joined George Bush in propping up many big businesses begging to fail. I wonder, at what point, will these small businesses that have a big impact will simply declare "enough!"

Kevin Price is a syndicated columnist whose articles frequently appear at ChicagoSunTimes.com, Reuters.com, USAToday.com, and other national media. Kevin Price is Host of the Price of Business (M-F at 11 AM on CNN 650) and Publisher of the Houston Business Review. Hear the show live and online at PriceofBusiness.com. Visit the archive of past shows here.

Fox Business and News Breaks Bailout Agreement

I just received an email from Jessica Rice of Fox Business who was telling me a story that will most likely be missed by most in the media -- the role of the Fox networks in breaking the federal bailout story, and of Fox Business in particular. She wrote that "this afternoon, FOX Business Network’s senior Washington correspondent Peter Barnes was the only one to obtain the Senate Banking Committee agreement of principle outline that Senator Democrats and some Republicans had agreed upon to propose to the President today at the big economic meeting."

She added that "Barnes... had the first concrete piece of paper we saw on this outline. Additionally, this afternoon at 12:54 PM ET, after a fundamental, initial deal had finally been reached between Democrats and Republicans on Secretary Paulson’s $700 billion bailout plan, FOX Business Network beat all the major cable news networks" with this information.

Finally, Rice indicated that Fox Business "was the first to report news of the deal at 12:54pm ET, followed by Bloomberg, FOX News Channel, CNBC, MSNBC, and CNN."

Some have argued why there was a need for an additional business network and others, because of their ideological agendas, have suggested that Fox wouldn't be taken seriously. News Corp has always been a leader in innovation and journalism. From the creation of a television business news network that pursues the interests of Wall Street to Main Street in Fox Business or in its purchase of the Bible of the financial world, The Wall Street Journal.

The thing I have enjoyed in working with the network is the sense of family I have seen that is so contrary to journalism today. I have had Alexis Glick, David Asman, Jonathan Hoenig, and others from the network on the program and their genuine love for their network is seen in the way they perform their jobs and how they represent the company.

In addition to providing a sense of understanding in its concerns about Main Street it also maintains a commitment to being "fair and balanced" that is similar to its sister station, Fox News. Because we have become so accustomed to a media bias with a driven agenda, we often see Fox as "Conservative." Honestly, it is only in the context of how blatantly liberal much of the rest of the media remains.

I congratulate Fox Business on these firsts as it approaches its very first anniversary. I am expecting even more from the network in the years to come.

Kevin Price articles frequently appear at ChicagoSunTimes.com, Reuters.com, USAToday.com, and other national media.

Kevin Price is Host of the Price of Business (M-F at 11 AM on CNN 650) and Publisher of the Houston Business Review. Hear the show live and online at HoustonBusinessShow.com. Visit the archive of past shows here.

The High Cost of Socialized Banking

I am no fan of welfare. In fact, I take every opportunity to take shots at systems designed to reward laziness, inefficiency, and the subsidizing of poverty. Although there seems to be far more opportunities to write about welfare for the poor, I have even greater disdain for the subsidizing of the rich. So when the stories of banks "on the ropes" and the pending government bailouts hit the news, I was disgusted.

The federal government has announced it was willing to shore up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by purchasing its stock if it proved "necessary." Libertarians and liberals were quick to call this "fascism." Strong word, but since fascism entails government "partnership with" and subsidy to business, the shoe fits. That is exactly what the Bush administration appears to be advocating. I can't stomach an administration that, on the one hand, decries welfare for the poor but is willing to dig deep into the government's coffers for big business.

How deep? According to Forbes, "It's going to be a mind-popping $25 billion over fiscal 2009 and 2010, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which released its estimate of the rescue plan Tuesday morning. Let's put that in perspective: $25 billion for two financial institutions compared with $125 billion for the entire S&L industry in 1989-1991? Ouch." By the way, the S&L crisis was another example of government fascism in support of the rich.

There is another concept in economics that irresponsible banks need to learn. Moral hazard. Moral hazard is the possibility or probability that a party insulated from risk may behave differently from the way it would behave if it were fully exposed to the risk. Who knows, the current banking crisis may be linked to the S&L crisis of the 1980s and 1990s. If we allowed S&Ls to face the full brunt of their decisions, who knows, financial institutions may have thought twice before diving so quickly into the sub prime loans they are suffering from today. Lesson NOT learned, since government is strongly entertaining bailing financial institutions again.

Welfare is usually dangerous and harmful. When it is done to benefit big business, it is the adding of insult to injury.

Would you like to get a periodical email of the best of Kevin Price's political and economic content? Subscribe to the Houston Business Review at Info@HoustonBusinessShow.com.

Kevin Price is Host of the Houston Business Show (M-F at 11 AM on CNN 650) and Publisher of the Houston Business Review. Hear the show live and online at HoustonBusinessShow.com. Visit the archive of past shows here.